Rover is bye bye

All things not relating to the other forums.
Post Reply
User avatar
rmel
United States of America
Posts: 1400
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:19 pm
Location: Woodside, CA
Contact:

Rover is bye bye

Post by rmel »

Puller: 71' 710K 2.7L EFI aka Mozo
Follower: Sankey MK 3, 3/4 Tonne
Rescue Pinz: 73' 712MK

Driver: Ron // KO0Q
User avatar
Garrycol
Australia
Posts: 423
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:49 am
Location: Canberra Australia

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by Garrycol »

There is a new vehicle in train - just with a different name - they could have kept the old name but for marketing purposes will be dropped.
1973 Haflinger AP700
1977 Landrover FC 101
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1971 Jaguar Series 3 E-Type Conv
1957 Landrover 88" Station Wagon
1957 Landrover 88"
User avatar
cascade.king
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:41 am
Location: Vermont, USA

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by cascade.king »

The Series/Defender is dead.
Long live the Series/Defender!
Mike
1971 North American 700AP Haflinger Pathfinder
User avatar
GenevaPinz
Switzerland
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:00 pm
Location: near Perth, Scotland

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by GenevaPinz »

This one is a puzzle to me.
Jeep managed to completely re-invent and improve the Wrangler over the last 20 years, with limited complaints from "purists" who had considered switching to square headlamps on the mid-90s YJ a sacrilege. Sales keep going while they stuck to the spirit of the earlier models. Why Land Rover gave up on such an evolution with their most iconic product, and decided to flush it all down, give enough time to the most hard-core followers to buy elsewhere and then start anew, I really don't understand. I am in no way a marketing expert but this makes no sense to me.
Jan

'72 Pinzgauer 710M
63rover
Canada
Posts: 239
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:18 pm
Location: Mt. Hope, Ont., Canada

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by 63rover »

There have long been rumours that Tata will pack up the plant and move it to India and restart there with an electronically less complicated truck for the 3rd world. They will have fewer safety and environmental regs to meet.
User avatar
GadgetPhreak
United States of America
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:14 pm
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by GadgetPhreak »

My theory is that with all of the brands/models being brought back very successfully (charger, challenger, GT40, etc.), that Land Rover is setting the name aside for a few years to create pent up demand and then will re-release it to capitalize on the buzz generated. I wouldn't be at all surprised for it to just be a ploy and they will just release again right away. The power and value of social media marketing is equal to, or better than, traditional marketing, making a move like this extremely powerful if done correctly.

Time will tell ;-)

Ben
King County Search & Rescue | Regional Special Vehicles Unit
1972 710M - Building up for SAR use
Follow my build, learn more, or contact me: http://www.sarpinz.com
User avatar
GenevaPinz
Switzerland
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:00 pm
Location: near Perth, Scotland

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by GenevaPinz »

GadgetPhreak wrote:My theory is that with all of the brands/models being brought back very successfully (charger, challenger, GT40, etc.), that Land Rover is setting the name aside for a few years to create pent up demand and then will re-release it to capitalize on the buzz generated. I wouldn't be at all surprised for it to just be a ploy and they will just release again right away. The power and value of social media marketing is equal to, or better than, traditional marketing, making a move like this extremely powerful if done correctly.

Time will tell ;-)

Ben
Interesting. I don't think any manufacturer can afford to mothball a successful car/truck to create demand, I believe they need to milk the good ideas here and now in order to pay for R&D and develop (or at least survive)... but I am no car industry guru, and my lack of faith in the power of social media might just be another sign of ageing... :lol:
so indeed, time will tell :wink:
Jan

'72 Pinzgauer 710M
User avatar
GadgetPhreak
United States of America
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 12:14 pm
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by GadgetPhreak »

GenevaPinz wrote: Interesting. I don't think any manufacturer can afford to mothball a successful car/truck to create demand, I believe they need to milk the good ideas here and now in order to pay for R&D and develop (or at least survive)... but I am no car industry guru, and my lack of faith in the power of social media might just be another sign of ageing... :lol:
so indeed, time will tell :wink:
Oh, no expert here either ;-) - just an "armchair quarterback"

I do some work with the Auto Industry and have a fair bit of product development experience (hardware and software product development and business & strategy management for Microsoft) so I'm extrapolating what I have observed to this scenario.. who knows if the translation works accurately or not.

I completely agree that the Defender is a strong brand, the question is do we think it's a strong brand because of our areas of expertise and interests. How strong is the brand actually with the average consumer worldwide.. I don't know. I can imagine that it's not as strong as Jeep Wrangler is, and maybe that is what Land Rover sees as the opportunity, how to take the brand more mainstream.. It's fun to observe and wonder though. :-)

Ben
King County Search & Rescue | Regional Special Vehicles Unit
1972 710M - Building up for SAR use
Follow my build, learn more, or contact me: http://www.sarpinz.com
User avatar
Garrycol
Australia
Posts: 423
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:49 am
Location: Canberra Australia

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by Garrycol »

The current Defender will not meet upcoming safety requirements and given the way it is built it would be too expensive to make the vehicle compliant.

The new vehicle will fulfil the same role as the Defender and Land Rover could have called it a Defender but they have taken the opportunity to start with a new name. Remember the Defender name has only been around for 26 years and before that it was just a Landrover (insert wheelbase here). The name Defender was a break with that tradition (with uproar at the time) just as cutting the name Defender is now.

Really the Defender was a bit of a dinosaur that was well past its useby date.

The new Defender - pick a pic - your guess is as good as anyone elses. https://www.google.com.au/search?q=new+ ... 9MM0k5o%3D

Garry
1973 Haflinger AP700
1977 Landrover FC 101
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1971 Jaguar Series 3 E-Type Conv
1957 Landrover 88" Station Wagon
1957 Landrover 88"
User avatar
VinceAtReal4x4s
Admin
United States of America
Posts: 2039
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: Ca. or lost in South West USA
Contact:

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by VinceAtReal4x4s »

I wouldn't be surprised if the Wrangler goes the same way soon. (no big loss there)
"For those who risk, life has a flavor the protected shall never enjoy"

Your donation makes this site possible!

Image
User avatar
GenevaPinz
Switzerland
Posts: 520
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:00 pm
Location: near Perth, Scotland

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by GenevaPinz »

GadgetPhreak wrote:I completely agree that the Defender is a strong brand, the question is do we think it's a strong brand because of our areas of expertise and interests. How strong is the brand actually with the average consumer worldwide.. I don't know.
This made me wonder about my own perception of the Defender...
I live in Switzerland (mountain country with strong currency), which upon researching the subject seems to always have been a big market for the Defender compared to the size of the country: with a population of just 7 million, Switzerland's LR importer received around 10% of the special edition Defenders ("Celebration Series") produced last year.
...and the place where I go usually on vacation is Scotland, which is without surprise a strong market as well with a lot of rural, hilly country in the UK itself...

So I must admit that my perception of the Defender's popularity is probably (heavily) biased!!
Jan

'72 Pinzgauer 710M
User avatar
audiocontr
United States of America
Posts: 1868
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 1:30 pm
Location: Buffalo NY

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by audiocontr »

VinceAtReal4x4s wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if the Wrangler goes the same way soon. (no big loss there)
Being in the industry - I have to disagree. The Wrangler market share is gigantic within its class. No reason for Chrysler to pull it back. In fact, the steady wrangler sales keep many of their lesser models afloat.

Jeep has such a tight hold that Ford has nothing in their line up to compete.
1973 712m
1968 Haflinger
1965 Pathfinder
1978 GMC Palm Beach (Hey, its got 6 wheels!!)
User avatar
Garrycol
Australia
Posts: 423
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:49 am
Location: Canberra Australia

Re: Rover is bye bye

Post by Garrycol »

Might be great in the good ole US of A but is crap everywhere else. They have a poor reputation for build quality and reliability and are not popular here in Aust.5

Garry
1973 Haflinger AP700
1977 Landrover FC 101
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1971 Jaguar Series 3 E-Type Conv
1957 Landrover 88" Station Wagon
1957 Landrover 88"
Post Reply