NO gas from CITGO in my vehicles!

All things not relating to the other forums.
justfred
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:13 pm
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Contact:

What's good for the goose

Post by justfred »

springhill wrote:There are certain so-called leaders that would be better off dead----meaning the citizens of their country would enjoy a better life without them. It would save more lives to eliminate the trouble maker instead of the people that serve them.
Really? So by that argument it should be okay for some other country to send black ops in to assisinate our president, right?

Ah, the stench of politics - even more pungent than sulphur. Boycotting a gas station is almost entirely useless. If it makes you feel better, great, but I won't do a damned bit of good.

Personally I've got no problem with Chavez going off on our president - who seems to spend a lot of his time calling other world leaders evil dictators.

Best thing to do is get rid of our gas-guzzling needlessly large mechanical toys, and learn to ride our bicycles instead. We'd be healthier too, until we get run down by someone not so environmentally concious. You're welcome to go first.
lindenengineering
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Golden Colorado USA
Contact:

Post by lindenengineering »

Just a few words about the French.
I was an exchange "Francofile" student on the early 1970's studying in Lille.
All I can say is that the ordinary French people from my experiences were very grateful for the Allies liberation of their country.

To illustrate I used to go to Carteret in the summer (on the Cherbour peninsular) on frequent occasions to chase a girl who I had the hots for. Her mother a widow owned a bakery shop in this small town. She often would tell me of the liberation by US forces and how grateful their family was for their freedom after 5 years of occupation. She would often mention how friendly the US forces were and how respectful black GI's were to the population

My late father (ex paratrooper and his brother went to France for the 50th anniversary of D Day escorted by my youngest brother. On the way they met up with some American Vets who had been shut out of the celebrations due to security concerns as Bill Clinton and the "Bush Poodle" strutted their stuff at Omaha Beach. These blokes palled up with old American comrades and took the bus with the Brits to Ranville near Caen. My brother said that no matter what nationality, if you were an Allied Vet all meals were free in any restaurant, all rooms were free at any hotel and the mayor gave every Vet a welcome to his town and a grateful thanks for their contribution.
Although not to the same level of thanks my grandfathers & great uncles all served in the British Army in France & Belgium for 4 years fighting in the trenches. The British Foreign Legion arranged frequent reunions of old contemptables to Verdun, Cambrai and Ypres to mention just a few and they alway enjoyed a warm reception by the French and Belgian for their sacrifices.
As usual you won't get much credence from Government it sets a precedent to keep saying thanks but ordinary people are just poeple like you and I even if they are French and they do something opposite as I have illustrated.
Dennis
OOOps no customer bashing now
springhill
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: New Mexico

Post by springhill »

Justfred,
Most people rely on their vehicle to get them 15 minutes to work and back. I would like to see you try to make a living farming or ranching on a bicycle. Some people still make a living self-employed you know. I can't imagine hauling 500 yearlings to the sale ( 50 miles ) pulling a trailer with a environmentally friendly bicycle. Better yet, how about hauling produce that you buy at the grocery store with a battery powered car? The cost of production of these eco-friendly cars, plus the disposal of the LEAD batteries would be far more costly than the average SUV. Please refer to an article in last months 4-Wheel & Offroad. Don't read that? Why do you own an off-road vehicle if you don't support the people that fight the environmental whackos that don't want anyone but themselves to use the FEDERALLY owned land.
Linden,
I am glad to hear that some of the French are happy that Americans gave up their lives in order for them to enjoy the freedom that they have. What really pisses me off is the countries that make up the U.N. vote againse the United States 70% of the time. For example, Egypt votes against us 71% of the time, yet recieves over 6 Billion of our taxpayers dollars in aid every year. Does that make sense to you? We need to quit giving away aid to countries that don't give a damn.
A Little tiraid against environmental whackos and welfare countries.
Sorry if I offend you.
"Growing Old is Mandatory
Growing Up is Optional"
lindenengineering
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Golden Colorado USA
Contact:

Post by lindenengineering »

Springhill

It's a well known fact that the USA gives food abundantly especially to poor third world countries. My belief is that the USA has an ability to feed the world if needs be. These generous donations are not so innocent or well meaning as you might at first determine.

I am glad you mentioned Egypt because I experienced about 20 years ago a an exchange with an Egyptian merchant in Alex. Having driven to Akaba from Baghdad I took the ferry ship Saudi Moon to Port Said. After having got my LR off the ship I noticed a Liberian freighter off loading a huge shipment of rice. On the sacks the familar emblem of two hands and US Aid etc. I remarked to a mate 'Struth the Yanks are busy here!" Several weeks later I was up in the Ademia district of Alexandria and went into a small shop for some groceries. On the floor were those same sacks of rice I had seen in the port. The guy was selling the stuff to the poor.
I said to him this is free food for the population given by the USA why are you selling it? He essentially replied "don't be so naive that the food is given to the ruling classes who support our President". 'It's our bonus for that support".

So I determined that food aid is a political bonus given out by western countries (powers) to support or maybe even prop up not some not so popular regimes that are sympathetic to the West. We know already that in Zimbabwe now desperate for food aid that if you don't support the Mugabe regime you starve.
Political influence and allegiances come in all shapes sizes and reflections.
Politics is a devious business almost as elusive as religion to get to the bottom of!
Dennis
OOOps no customer bashing now
springhill
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: New Mexico

Post by springhill »

Linden,
It is a sad fact that well intentioned aid is mishandled by those in power.
What is equally sad is when those in power do not use the resources they have to make a better life for the inhabitants. We have friends who raise sheep and agora goats in South Africa. They have friends who were killed or run off their farms in Zimbabwe because they were white. Those productive farms are now in disarray because the people who took them over do not know how to run them productively.
Unfortunately, people who rely on the Govt. to survive will live a life with little to live for. A lesson the Americans should learn from.
"Growing Old is Mandatory
Growing Up is Optional"
Ghostbear
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 2:31 am
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI

Post by Ghostbear »

It is also sad that it is so easy to say that the giving is not so innocent or well meaning as you might first determine, it is really sad that you are so jaded in your views that you are willing to put the actions of some dictator on the other side of the world is somehow designed and carried out by the US for political gain. And that somehow the actions of someone in a podunk town in the middle of Alexandria, a place that 60% or more of the US probably doesnt even know exist, will somehow make the US political machine grind to a halt without it.

So, sad indeed. Since you arent so quick to point out the Oil for Food program and the UN's Secretary General involvement in that one, nope, it's all the US fault corrupting the world isnt it?

And not so quick to point out countries like Russia, FRANCE, and Germany that are so willing to sell restricted materials to IRAQ. The same materials that THEY agreed to not sell them in the UN Security Council Meetings, but did anyway UNDER the table. The same materials that the UN itself proved existed, and documented.

But, again it is all the US..

So, sad that you need to make loose and impossible to prove connections to make the US look like it is somehow in bed with things like this. And making it a personal commentary that nobody can verify, and therefore can only dispute if they were to insinuate that you were lying. So, it is the perfect answer. Unverifiable and a personal attack if any dispute is to be made about it.

So very sad.

I suppose that your same logic would put the US in bed with Muhammad Farrah Aidid when his lieutenants took the rice in Somalia, so that too was for the political benefit between the US and the Somali people in power.... Oh, wait, that ended with our guys getting killed. So, I guess that was the ONLY time that food relief was ACTUALLY intended for the people and not the powers that be, for political gains of the United States that is.
lindenengineering
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Golden Colorado USA
Contact:

Post by lindenengineering »

Ghostbear
You will notice that I mentioned in my last post quote "Western Countries" and yes it does draw reference to your mention Oil for Food programs if not mentioned directly etc. My post was specifically worded to cover some of these activities.

My views are not jaded as you suggest they are aired as a result of extensive travel & work in many third world countries where I worked and socialised with embassies and their staff. I kept my ears open and for the mostpart, kept my mouth shut and subsequently concluded after many years of experiences that western influences and activities are not so innocent as one might at first conclude.

Yes I agree that the countries you mentioned engaged in deplorable exports of materials that were used for secret weapon development. However hands are not clean. Since you sited something that seemed to be obscure I will relate to you an activity that was publically and extensively aired after the event.

If we go back to the Iran hostage incident there was an edict issued by the US gov that all connections with that country be severed. Other Euro powers were encouraged to do the same. In the 1980's I was on a spent battlefield outside Sulamania and picked off the floor a fragment of a missile "General Dynamics 1981" . I enquired to the evidence in my hand with the Military Attache at the British Embassy (where I was required to report from time to time). My question inquisitively was "What is our involvement in the Iran/Iraq war, thought it was supposed to be one of logistical support only?". The Colonel was a switched on bloke who knew his "marbels". "Yes purely logistical support dear boy", was he response.
I then pulled out the fragment from my brief case "What do you make of this "Stinger"? 'Used by who Iraq or Iran'? After a brief pause "Iran".
"How are they getting them. I thought there was an arms embargo by the US, a logistical only posture?". The another long pause (obviously for a well rounded political response.) Then the well said reply so typically Brit.
Well let's just say that the USA is persuing its own agenda at the moment and leave it at that".
Lovely! What was the expression in the Western movies of the 1950 when Regan was a film star, 'White man speak with forked tongue"!
Of course it was the Arms for Contras debackle, Ollie North, and Regan coming on TV stating he knew nothing about it!--- But James Baker did didn't he? He he!
Look let's not kid ourselves here, every large powerful country has a an "army' of civil servants engaged in furthering political advantage on the international stage and an equally skillful support body to handle spin and political campaigns on the domestic front. There are are some well skilled people polished individuals involved in all this behind the political scene, countries don't become powerful being the nice guy. Really its a dog eat dog world and let's not forget it.
Dennis
OOOps no customer bashing now
EuroPinz
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:14 am

Post by EuroPinz »

well done Dennis.
I couldn't have said it any better. Yes, I am from Europe, and yes I have also extensively traveled and worked in 3rd world countries, and yes I was based in Dubai in the 80's (until Desert Shield), and yes ... I heard and saw a lot of things ...
There is no sense in pointing the finger as in one way or another all countries have some serious thinking to do and hope nobody will find out!!

How about we stop this thread and go back to what we love: PINZGAUER's

Regards to all of you
lindenengineering
Posts: 715
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:14 pm
Location: Golden Colorado USA
Contact:

Post by lindenengineering »

Yes I agree there is however a propensity especially here in the USA to judge other people as being from a : "Podunk" country , town or area as was suggested in the last post.

For information Alexandria was founded by Alexander the Great. It boasted the largest library in the ancient world and was a seat of learning for that period. Today it has a well respected university city majoring in the subject of Egyptology and the Ancient World. Yes scolars from the USA & elsewhere do visit this area to increase their knowledge of their chosen subjects. There are artifacts and ancient public works to study even for us 'ordinaries" and I might say that Alex is a pleasant place to spend some time.
Ademia is a suburb of Alex and is upmarket for want of a better description. Most of the consulates are to be found there and the last time I was wandering around even the USA had one located in the chic part. The whole of the area known as the Coniche boasts a clean beach, nice architecture, old Farouk palaces, very nice cafes and restaurants serving superbe Arab and Euro cuisine. The teas and coffees served with some of the best local chocolate delicacies are as good as you will find on the Cote D Azure.
I wonder if Podunck town WI can equal that after 2000 years of historical reference,after all its ink isn't yet dry on its statehood let alone anything else.
Dennis
OOOps no customer bashing now
justfred
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 5:13 pm
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Contact:

Post by justfred »

springhill wrote:Justfred,
Most people rely on their vehicle to get them 15 minutes to work and back....
I was being facetious. I understand and agree with your points. My point is that a personal boycott of a specific chain of gas stations is about as effective as asking people to use bicycles exclusively instead of fuel-powered vehicles. Either one isn't going to do anything, because of the larger issues. I'm well aware of the issues with electric vehicles. Personally? I ride the train to work, because I can. And ride my bike when I can (hoping not to get run over). And take my truck out camping when I can.
springhill wrote: Please refer to an article in last months 4-Wheel & Offroad. Don't read that? Why do you own an off-road vehicle if you don't support the people that fight the environmental whackos that don't want anyone but themselves to use the FEDERALLY owned land.
As a matter of fact, I don't read it because I really don't have much interest in jacked-up supermodified rock crawlers, which is what the 4-wheeling magazines seem to specialize in (sure, they have articles about other stuff, but that seems to me to be the focus every time I look at one). I'm more interested in expeditions and remote travel than re-re-re blasting through the Rubicon. I pick up Land Rover Owner now and then.

But as far as the environmental wackos - there's two sides to every story. Should we reserve the FEDERALLY owned land for cattle ranchers and oil miners? Prohibit dirt-roading but use federal funds to install logging roads so they can rape the wilderness? Have you noticed these issues tend to split things into "us versus them" where neither party is the real problem - off-roaders vs "whackos" rather than citizens vs government/corporations? Yep, I guess I'm branding myself as a raving lunatic liberal even though I consider my politics to be libertarian.

In any case, I'll stick to buying my gas wherever it's relatively less expensive and convenient, and to criticizing my government as long as I'm still allowed to.
Twin Pinzies
Posts: 545
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: San Juan Mountains, CO

Post by Twin Pinzies »

The above forum just illustrates how Bush realy is "a uniter-not a divider."

AARrrggghh!!!!!!! Way to go. Now we hate each other!
milesdzyn
Posts: 550
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:32 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Contact:

Post by milesdzyn »

Twin Pinzies....That was the best post of the whole thread! Sums it up quite nicely.

Miles
Ghostbear
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 2:31 am
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI

Post by Ghostbear »

Thanks for the bit of Geography and History, and No I don’t think that Podunk WI will EVER have that kind of history, nor did it invalidate the point. OR do you prefer ‘rural’ as the moniker. IF this is going to be about semantics, then this is going to go nowhere. You say colour and I say color. Get over it.

And how the heck is Iraq a WESTERN country? You said that your comment referred to Western Countries as the cause of these kinds of problems. And then say that you referred, while not directly, the Oil for Food program. How exactly is Iraq or Kofie Annon part of a western country? He is from Africa, yes? Not really Western unless you are in India….

Well, I suppose that I again can’t refute the claims you have of your travels throughout the world. And with no reference to anything but what you are saying; I have no way to say anything about them. You are free to make anything up and say what you will of what you found, heard or viewed in your travels. Because there is no way to neither confirm nor deny the validity of your statements.

It was very convenient that you found the name plate of a GD missile, the same name plate that is on the inside of the missile’s access cover, you know right next to the high explosive charge. You do realize that the design of missiles for decades have placed any of the nameplates and electronic assemblies as close as possible to the explosive to minimize the ability to distinguish who made it and make the smallest particles so that you cant reverse engineer it. But, kudos on finding a nameplate that had the mfg and date on it. Did you keep it? Because that really was a find. I mean, no kidding, it was pure luck that he found it.

And even if you did find it... Who supplied it? Was it a different country? Like say… France, Germany, Spain or ANY one of the DOZENS of countries that were supplied with US made weapons. Nope, it had to be the US, because there are no components or fully made articles in any other country that were from somewhere else, right? Damn, I am wrong on that too. An AK-47 mfg in China is sold to say, Iraq. And then Iraq sells them to say… Al Qaeda. The Chinese are supplying the terrorists… ??? OR is this just getting too complicated? One more example; The French (Aerospatiale to be exact) sold AM-39 Ship Launched and MM-40 Air Launched Exocet Anti-Ship Missiles to the following list of people: Pakistan, Abu Dhabi, Argentina, Singapore, Brazil, Oman, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Qatar, Peru. If ANY one of them sold a single missile to someone else and that someone else shot it at another country is France to blame? BUT GOD help you, the stinking identity plates will say Aerospatiale ALL OVER THEM and Aerospatiale means FRANCE . Same logic, France must have sold them directly to the ones that shot it because how else would they have gotten there? Am I beating a dead horse yet? Or should I go on? Just because you found a single plate from General Dynamics doesn’t mean anything. Neither does a conversation with some un-named Colonel at some Brit Embassy.

But, lets get into the thick of this: From the Redstone Arsenal History docs, the Stinger Program note for Financial Year 81 had this little gem in it:

FY 81 Seven NATO countries—Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Greece, Turkey, and Italy—formed a STINGER Project Group. The European group requested a letter of offer for the STINGER technical data package (TDP), the first step toward establishing a coproduction program.

So, you can look it up at the following URL: http://www.redstone.army.mil/history/sy ... INGER.html
Toward the top middle, just follow the dates.

Or you could go to the following little blurb:
The CIA helped supply nearly 500 Stingers (some sources claim 1500) to the mujahideen guerrillas fighting Soviet forces in Afghanistan during the 1980s.
So, those missiles could have been bought from the muhahideen as well.

But, even though you kept your mouth shut and your ears open, all you heard was what you wanted.

While you saw the rice being sold, You could have missed the 1390 other bags of rice were given out to the poor. You did say it was a huge shipment. And you clearly coulnt account for what happened to the rest of the rice. But, you didnt need to, you already KNEW where it went, without having a shread of proof.

You didn’t see that there could have even been some other explanation or source for a single General Dynamics Missile that could have made its way into the battle field by a hundred different ways, all you saw was it was the US that supplied them. That Colonel could have been pulling a reason out of the air, and you just sucked it up and spit it back out here. That Colonel could have been some desk jockey that wouldn’t have known an AM-39 from an AMRAAM.

Sure as hell we sell arms to people, and supply either side at one time or another. Hell for some time we supplied Iran, but not lately. The US is no saint. And I have no delusions that it is, nor ever will be. But, why is it that people can’t see past their own petty little views of the world. You don’t like the US, I don’t care why, but you don’t. I have seen that from the numerous posts you have made about this or that and how different and better it was in some other place than here. But, here you are… Still in the United States, making a fine living servicing foreign vehicles. But, you still have the view that if it can be blamed on the US then it must be the US that did it. When you found that plate, I would be willing to bet ten dollars to a donut, that you didn’t even think that the missile could have come from anywhere else but a direct supply by the US. And it is that narrow view that you cant see past that is why I cant argue.

See, the points you made were based on your own personal views and experiences. There is no way in hell I can get any documentation that you were even there at the embassy, let alone talking to the Colonel. All you pointed to were suppositions, not documentable fact as the meat and potatos of your arguments. Sure you sprinkled on some facts like the Iran-Contra Ollie North stuff, but that was like gravy on the mashed potatos. It isnt the gravy that fills you up, it is the potatos. Want an example, the whole rice sales story told. Is there any proof that it even happened?

To you the results are set, the US did it, or GD provided the missile. Even with evidence that would say without a doubt that it could have come from elsewhere. Not that it DID, but that it COULD. And that it COULD didn’t even get a single thought. That is what I meant by jaded.
Lightningpinz
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:32 pm
Location: Lakewood, Co

Post by Lightningpinz »

Ya know I read a book my parents had in the 60's called "THE UGLY AMERICAN". I don't remember all of it, but there was American supplied food (aid) going to the rich and when an American Congressional deligation went to Korea for a visit the shock absorbers were removed from the vehicles to help impress the congressmen with how bad the roads were so MORE MONEY would be sent. We can go on rambling on how bad the other governments are, but it looks like WE (US) have spent many years training them that our polititions will squander our money and good will where ever they can think they are helping or influencing the rest of the world. Now whose fault is that really?
melensdad
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:32 am
Location: Indiana

Post by melensdad »

It is easy to say that not buying Citgo will cost 40,000 American jobs, but it is simply not true. It is not the way the free market works. Should Citgo lose volume, the refinery would simply be sold and the workers would just work for a new owner.

It is also nothing more than an irrational scare tactic to suggest that oil will skyrocket to $120 per barrel, but even if that is true which is highly unlikely, it simply suggests that people should always buy from the cheapest source, no matter what the consequences. Sorry, but that is just another way of suggesting that it is OK to force prisioners and children to make our goods cheaper in foreign lands. Buying from the cheap supplier has its consequences. Sometimes it hurts a little to do the right thing.


But this was just in the news . . .

7-Eleven dropping Venezuela-backed Citgo
By DAVID KOENIG, AP Business Writer 46 minutes ago

DALLAS - 7-Eleven Inc. is dropping Venezuela-backed Citgo as its gasoline supplier after more than 20 years as part of a previously announced plan by the convenience store operator to launch its own brand of fuel.

7-Eleven officials said Wednesday that the company's decision was partly motivated by politics.

Citgo Petroleum Corp. is a Houston-based subsidiary of Venezuela's state-run oil company and 7-Eleven is worried that anti-American comments made by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez might prompt motorists to fill-up elsewhere.

Chavez has called President George W. Bush the devil and an alcoholic. The U.S. government has warned that Chavez is a destabilizing force in Latin America.

"Regardless of politics, we sympathize with many Americans' concern over derogatory comments about our country and its leadership recently made by Venezuela's president," said 7-Eleven spokeswoman Margaret Chabris.
If you are interested in antique tracked snow vehicles, visit here: http://www.forumsforums.com/3_9/forumdisplay.php?f=65
Post Reply