which is faster?

All things not relating to the other forums.
ka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: slc,scruz,chico,bldr,kalalau,flag,sb

which is faster?

Post by ka »

is a 712m noticably slower at accellerating than a 710m? i know the 712 has a lower geared tranny so its top speed is like 5 mph less, but i've only ever driven a 712amb and this 710m, never a 712m.
1973 710m
"it is not in the best interest of the shepherd to breed smarter sheep." ~ author unknown

press any key to continue or any other key to quit. ~author confidential
Jim LaGuardia
United States of America
Posts: 1704
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: San Bernardino Ca
Contact:

Post by Jim LaGuardia »

The 710 accellerates faster and has a 10mph higher top speed.
The average 712 will go 55-60mph(screaming), while a good running 710 can exceed 70mph, That does not however mean it is safe to sustain.
At high rpm's the carbs cannot supply enough fuel resulting in melted pistons.
This is where injection changes the curve..................................
Cheers, Jim LaGuardia
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v510/Goatwerks/
"Arch Magus of Machines."
ka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: slc,scruz,chico,bldr,kalalau,flag,sb

Post by ka »

whoa... a gr8 reason to go efi. art here drove jake raby's efi pinz and says my normal pinz runs just as good, but i'm seeing it really does not like cold. i'd also like to not have to bother with the elevation problem.
1973 710m
"it is not in the best interest of the shepherd to breed smarter sheep." ~ author unknown

press any key to continue or any other key to quit. ~author confidential
chapel
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:35 pm
Location: Sparks, NV
Contact:

Post by chapel »

A 710M feels like a sports car compared to the 712M's slowness.
greg
1973 710M (sold)
1976 712M (sold)
Looking for a Haffy
ka
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: slc,scruz,chico,bldr,kalalau,flag,sb

Post by ka »

well maybe i dont really want a 712 then. but isn't there an updated tranny available that has a gear for that extra top speed?
1973 710m
"it is not in the best interest of the shepherd to breed smarter sheep." ~ author unknown

press any key to continue or any other key to quit. ~author confidential
Badger
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:11 pm
Location: Underground, Great Britain.

Post by Badger »

ka wrote:whoa... a gr8 reason to go efi. art here drove jake raby's efi pinz and says my normal pinz runs just as good, but i'm seeing it really does not like cold. i'd also like to not have to bother with the elevation problem.
Elevation problem ? Cold ?

That doesn't sound good considering I'm thinking of traversing the Haute Atlas in winter - and will definitely be above the snow line for part of that journey ! Is this a significant Pinz problem ?
CEO- Chief Excavating Officer
Badger Corporation

www.badgercorporation.com
http://landnavigation.co.uk/
M Wehrman
United States of America
Posts: 847
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Gilbert, Az.

Post by M Wehrman »

Badger,
you will need the carbs jetted for the altitude,expect a power loss,but a lot of Pinz's came from Switzerland,it gets kinda high there too! :lol:
Stock means no imagination!


Volvo TGB1317, .95% Morphed!



68 Haffy
Jim LaGuardia
United States of America
Posts: 1704
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: San Bernardino Ca
Contact:

Post by Jim LaGuardia »

For high altitude, reduce jets from 140 to 130, no lower than 125.
My injection computer compensates beyond 10,000 ft 8)
Cheers, Jim LaGuardia
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v510/Goatwerks/
"Arch Magus of Machines."
Profpinz
Australia
Posts: 1056
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Contact:

Post by Profpinz »

My injection computer compensates beyond 10,000 ft
Hmmm, we haven't got anything in Australia over 7300 feet..... other than planes etc! :D :wink: :roll:
Peter

1974, 712 6X6 Pinzgauer
1983, 710-1.6 4X4 Pinzgauer
1997, 718 6X6 Pinzgauer (in pieces)
1971, 700 Haflinger
1974, 703 LWB Haflinger
2001, Range Rover

http://www.ozpinz.com
Erik712m
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Wichita, Kansas

Post by Erik712m »

Hmmm.... We haven't got anything in Australia over 7300 feet!
I was 8000 this morning. :lol: :lol: :lol: Use to around 1100.
Bruce Berger
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Tehachapi, CA

Post by Bruce Berger »

One reason I decided to go with EFI was that I have gone from below sea level to over 11,000 feet in the same weekend. In this part of California it's impossible to have the right jets in your carbs at all times.
Bruce Berger
'72 Pinzgauer 710M 2.6i
mit Beck-LaGuardia Elektronischer Einspritzung
andy
Posts: 963
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:31 pm
Location: Comstock, TX

Post by andy »

ka, my 712 doesn't really "feel" slower than my 710 from a standing start.

I can leave the 712 in second gear to get rolling, like at a traffic light. The 710 wants 1st gear. Anything else requires lots (comparitively speaking) of clutch and lots of accelerator.

The 712 likes cruising at around 54-55 mph. It does not like to accelerate down hills, meaning my foot on the pedal hasn't changed, but gravity has set in and when it hits 62-63 mph the 4500 rpm light comes on.

The 710 just hums along and possibly because of the difference in weight doesn't pickup quite as much speed coming of a hill. No 4500 rpm problems there which is starting to make me wonder about the module. The 710 doesn't mind cruising at 55-58 mph.

My speed figures about cruising are based on where it runs without any obvious effort from my right foot to move it along faster.

It does seem that I go through the gears much quicker from a standing start in the 712 than the 710. To me that's the difference in the gearing.

Hope that adds to what you wanted to know.

Andy
A bar F
The buck STARTS here
www.deerleaseservices.com
Badger
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:11 pm
Location: Underground, Great Britain.

Post by Badger »

In crossing the Haute Atlas it's quite possible, within the space of 24 hours, to go from sea level and moderate temperatures in Northern Morocco, to over 9,000 feet and snow, then descend down to around 2,000 feet and the heat of the approaches to the Saharan desert. In the desert nights temperatures drop to well below freezing. Is the Pinz really that sensitive to jet size ?
CEO- Chief Excavating Officer
Badger Corporation

www.badgercorporation.com
http://landnavigation.co.uk/
russ
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: FL
Contact:

Post by russ »

Well, here in FL, I've driven to a few feet below sea level (in fresh water) to a whopping 190 ft above while traveling across the Sunshine Skyway Bridge and 345 ft above sea level at Britton Hill, the highest point in FL. :D

So how much silicon and liquid plastic is required to seal up that EFI for U-Boat use?
If you didn't get stuck, you didn't try hard enough.
'74 710K

1984 in 2009
User avatar
McCall Pinz
Switzerland
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: McCall, Idaho

Post by McCall Pinz »

My understanding is that if you're jetted for sealevel you may loose some power and burn more fuel at altitude, but that's better than jetting for altitude and running lean when you come down and burn up a valve.
Post Reply